Settings and activity
19 results found
-
135 votes
Megan Turlington supported this idea ·
-
354 votes
Megan Turlington supported this idea ·
-
58 votes
Megan Turlington supported this idea ·
-
331 votes
Megan Turlington supported this idea ·
-
144 votes
Megan Turlington supported this idea ·
-
622 votes
Megan Turlington supported this idea ·
-
126 votes
Megan Turlington supported this idea ·
-
40 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Megan Turlington supported this idea ·
-
503 votes
Megan Turlington supported this idea ·
-
414 votes
Megan Turlington supported this idea ·
-
253 votes
Megan Turlington supported this idea ·
-
535 votes
Megan Turlington supported this idea ·
-
403 votes
Megan Turlington supported this idea ·
-
323 votes
Megan Turlington supported this idea ·
-
383 votes
Megan Turlington supported this idea ·
-
334 votes
Megan Turlington supported this idea ·
-
776 votes
Megan Turlington supported this idea ·
-
708 votes
Megan Turlington supported this idea ·
-
880 votes
Megan Turlington supported this idea ·
Not having this feature has prevented us from using BLVD for inventory tracking entirely when it comes to dermal fillers. The current workarounds still display the specific product used on patient-facing receipts, which creates issues in practices like ours where providers charge differently based on product.
To work around this, we would have to manually adjust every service across four neurotoxins and more than 25 fillers—customizing by business and location, configuring each add-on, updating pricing, managing deposit settings (which are based on percentages but default to $0 when added this way), and ensuring product accuracy throughout. This is a significant and error-prone lift for any team to manage.
Allowing multiple products per service—and giving businesses the option to hide those individual product names from patient receipts—would drastically improve both inventory accuracy and operational efficiency for practices like ours.