Settings and activity
644 results found
-
32 votes
Jeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteJeremy Shieh
shared this idea
·
-
1 voteJeremy Shieh
shared this idea
·
-
3 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
519 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeremy Shieh
commented
Go to "Front Desk" tab, checkout the primary (paying) client, then DRAG using the mouse the subsequent appointments INTO the already open checkout window. They will now add the appointments together onto a single order.
If you need to change "who" is the payee, the click the icon next to the client name in the checkout window and swap to the proper client.
If you need to remove an appointment from the combined order, go to the service in the checkout window and REMOVE SERVICE, this will remove the service from that checkout and won't delete the appointment. Now check them out normally.
It appears you can only do this from the FRONT DESK tab :)
-
149 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeremy Shieh
commented
Love it! but many blvd clients have locations that are not in the same metros as each other and having the messages cross to other locations would only cause confusion. Also instead of a pop up at bottom, I believe a better UX would be to have a bubble come out of the Message tab itself that would persist until dismissed along with a snooze button to alert user again in ~5 min or so.
-
8 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeremy Shieh
commented
I believe we are paying for receiving messages too, in the case that somehow a business is receiving spam messages and they increase there is no way to avoid this increasing spend and wasting resources for both the business and boulevard. A method of blocking this activity would hopefully solve this issue.
-
53 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
232 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
14 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
25 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
46 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
For example: Beta reports < Daily Summary < Group by month name ; currently orders the grouping column by month name and sorts the months alphabetically. (Apr,Aug,Dec,Feb...) this data probably would never be used in this fashion and it would be far more helpful to order them (Jan,Feb,Mar,Apr...). If perhaps the months could be titled 2024-01-Jan, 2024-02-Feb, 2024-03-Mar; then this would potentially be more easily useful as opposed to the data that required manual outside manipulation at current