At current, we sell packages that contain vouchers for use with any staff. If the package sale is sold under a service provider, this service provider's product total on reports (not commission) reports will improperly show the packages which do not need to be enumerated as such. This requires salons to either pull product commission reports, go into the sale and adjust the seller (which may still not solve the problems as the clawback may be occurring outside the pay period), or manually deduct the amounts in order to not payout bonus on products that may not require bonus structured the way the other products are done.

Utilizing commission reports for this does work, but is on a cash basis rather than accrual in that payroll summation still requires manual thought process to make sure the clawback is appropriately hitting the same period rather than a different one.

Easiest solution (opinion) is to have the ability to have certain products or packages have NO option for "seller" and lock to a default that cannot be overridden.

It would be helpful for reporting purposes to take service packages (vouchers) out of the Products category and have them as their own standalone.

Currently when you create a package for a service it has to be entered in as a product. This is misleading when you run a sales report as you see actual product sales and service package sales as one number.

Having Memberships separate from Products as this conflicts with our reporting. Even though in BLVD its considered a product, when I need to glance on sales or retail items for the day - a membership sold or processed should have its own section/tab for daily reporting. Just another unnecessary step.