Settings and activity
32 results found
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stephanie Knaus supported this idea ·
-
9 votes
Stephanie Knaus supported this idea ·
-
44 votes
Stephanie Knaus supported this idea ·
-
2 votes
Stephanie Knaus supported this idea ·
-
181 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stephanie Knaus commented
This was waitlisted back in 2022... what is the status?
An error occurred while saving the comment Stephanie Knaus commented
HOW IS THERE STILL NO WAY TO BLOCK OUT HOLIDAYS??? EACH BUSINESS SHOULD BE ABLE TO EASILY CLOSE THE BOOKS FROM CLIENTS BOOKING. Currently making every single service provider 'unavailable' takes too long, AND the way scheduling staff works atm ...doesn't hold the 'unavailable' block anyway!
Stephanie Knaus supported this idea ·
-
5 votes
Stephanie Knaus supported this idea ·
-
53 votes
Stephanie Knaus supported this idea ·
-
70 votes
Stephanie Knaus supported this idea ·
-
10 votes
We're in conversations with Shawn about his issue here. Kudos to him for catching what might be a bug that we plan to fix. We've also been able to adjust Precision Scheduling's settings to better suit their preferences. Please reach out to support if you'd like to adjust how Precision Scheduling works for your business. Between the bug fix and settings adjustment, we're confident we'll end up somewhere that works well for them!
Stephanie Knaus supported this idea ·
-
11 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stephanie Knaus commented
YOUR ONLINE PORTAL NEEDS TO INCLUDE ONLINE BOOKING IN IT. SUPER INCONVENIENT FOR CLIENTS TO NOT SEE WHAT THEY ALREADY HAVE BOOKED. LEADS TO OVERLAPPING APPOINTMENTS AND DUPLICATES! CLIENT CAN'T BE TWO PLACES AT ONCE. THERE IS NO WARNING TO THEM IF THEY ARE BOOKING OVER THE SAME TIME AS ONE OF THEIR EXISTING APPOINTMENTS
Stephanie Knaus supported this idea ·
-
23 votes
Stephanie Knaus supported this idea ·
-
43 votes
Stephanie Knaus supported this idea ·
-
615 votes
Stephanie Knaus supported this idea ·
-
7 votes
Stephanie Knaus supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
Stephanie Knaus supported this idea ·
-
6 votes
Stephanie Knaus supported this idea ·
-
3 votes
Stephanie Knaus supported this idea ·
-
53 votes
Stephanie Knaus supported this idea ·
-
25 votes
Stephanie Knaus supported this idea ·
-
2 votes
Stephanie Knaus shared this idea ·
Conversely... if a service that has a resource is changed to one that does not require one... it still holds that resource. Its a problem any way you slice it. Unfortunately, theres likely no way for blvd to monetize this... so it won't be fixed.