Settings and activity
641 results found
-
18 votes
Jeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
12 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
314 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesJeremy Shieh
shared this idea
·
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeremy Shieh
commented
I have never thought of that, and it is ingenious. If in purchase orders it can be done so that a distributor is selected and for what date range that it creates a report of what was expended and needs to be reordered a lot of time would be saved.
Jeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesJeremy Shieh
shared this idea
·
-
1 voteJeremy Shieh
shared this idea
·
-
2 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
140 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeremy Shieh
commented
For us the cases are:
Yes responders - perfect, nothing more needed
Yeah, yup - sometimes missed since we need to notice it and manually confirm it, leading to a phone call to confirm with them that causes clients to feel the confirming text didn't go anywhere.
No - Same as above, but if not noticed leads to revenue loss by not opening up the space for potential other clientsClients with group booked on same day - All confirmed when it may not be the case, but it is one number.
Clients with multiple appts multiple days near each other - potential for Blvd to be confused which appt is being confirmed via sms
Clients with appts that have moved around between the time that appt was attempted to be confirmed and new confirming window - blvd, client, and we do not know which appt the client is confirming forI do not know if this would work for all locations, but changing the response to be through client portal via link instead of SMS response should end a lot of these ambiguities. I imagine this being a tokenized link in each confirming SMS that leads to portal showing the appts and ability to confirm or adjust each of them, with cancelling actually cancelling the appt while keeping the late cancel policy in mind.
Jeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeremy Shieh
commented
This should trigger cancellation of the appt, or at the very lease flag the appt with a noticeable and discernable icon so staff will cancel it. If we are going to charge no-show fees, staff that do not have access to message center nor check it often should be able to know if the client did cancel to avoid the awkward scenario that we are charging no-show fees for clients that did in fact cancel.
-
3 votesJeremy Shieh
shared this idea
·
-
3 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesJeremy Shieh
supported this idea
·
I would really like it if the iPad was used more. If there was a hudden button in the Duo app to clock in and out and then use the iPad's camera to optical scan a barcode to confirm identity, this would make this a pretty substantial timeclock system. Or swipe in the Duo, or scan an NFC puck on Duo. Just something that isn't two employees relaying to each other, "can you clock me in early today?"
I would want to add employee driver's license barcodes into blvd so that there is much lower likelihood of people clocking each other in and out or using each other's pins. Hourly wages are getting very high and even 5 minutes of cheating here and there really adds up.